Judge declares mistrial in war objector case

Lt. Ehren Watada accused of missing movement, conduct unbecoming

Ted S. Warren / AP file	Army 1st Lt. Ehren Watada speaks to reporters and supporters in June in Tacoma, Wash.

Video: Military news

Obama inherits two wars
Nov. 21: NBC's Gen. Barry McCaffrey discusses the tough challenges the Obama administration will be facing after inheriting two wars and how America can expect newly appointed cabinet members to react to these situations.

Military goes green to save gas

On the frontlines in Afghanistan

View from the war zone

Five Gitmo prisoners ordered released

	Photos of soldiers who’ve made the ultimate sacrifice in Iraq and Afghanistan.
	Pictures and messages from U.S. troops overseas and their friends, family at home.

Laid to rest at Arlington

Reuters

Each week in ‘The Daily Nightly,’ NBC's John Rutherford pays tribute to the men and women killed in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Fact file

How big’s a division? What’s a battalion?

updated 9:56 p.m. ET Feb. 7, 2007

FORT LEWIS, Wash. - The judge overseeing the court-martial of an Army lieutenant who refused to deploy to Iraq declared a mistrial Wednesday, saying the soldier did not fully understand a document he signed admitting to elements of the charges.

First Lt. Ehren Watada was fighting charges of conduct unbecoming an officer and missing movement for refusing to leave last June with his unit, the 3rd Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division.

Earlier Wednesday, before his declaration, Lt. Col. John Head, the military judge, said the case could end in a mistrial if Watada’s lawyers refused to let the defendant answer the judge’s questions about potential inconsistencies with a “stipulation of fact” that Watada agreed to before the trial began.

Story continues below ↓

advertisement | your ad here

Before Head's ruling, an Army official said that if a mistrial was declared, it could be “months” before a new trial.

At the center of the dispute between the judge and the defense is Watada’s intent when he did not deploy with his unit to Iraq. The defense has consistently tried to call into question the legality of the war, because Watada said the war is illegal and a command to fight in Iraq is also illegal. But the judge has said the argument over the legality of the war is not a matter that can be settled in military court.

Watada's civilian defense attorney said he would invoke the protection against double jeopardy if the government followed through with plans to retry his client.

Eric Seitz said he will seek dismissal of the charges with prejudice, meaning they could not be refiled. The Army's judge advocate general at Fort Lewis said double jeopardy does not apply in this case.